Opinion
CA 06-00882.
September 22, 2006.
Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth R. Fisher, J.), entered Jun e 28, 2005. The amended order, inter alia, set forth the names of the 28 plaintiffs whose claims for medical monitoring expenses were dismissed.
FARACI LANGE, LLP, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN G. SCHWARZ OF COUNSEL), AND MASRY VITITOE, WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CALIFORNIA, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
WILLIAMS CONNOLLY, LLP, WASHINGTON, DC (STEVEN R. KUNEY, OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BAR, ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE, OF COUNSEL), AND BOND, SCHOENECK KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Allen v General Elec. Co. (32 AD3d 1163 [2006]).