Opinion
1:20CV1080
08-11-2021
DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR., Plaintiff, v. DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on July 20, 2021, was served on the parties in this action. (Docs. 3, 4.) Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 5.)
The objections assert that “employee [sic] of Durham County [D]etention [F]acility and Correct [C]are [S]olution fail[ed] to provide adequate health care” apparently in response to Plaintiff's alleged “request[] to have a root canal.” (Doc. 5 at 1.) The Complaint contains no allegations regarding a root canal request (see generally Doc. 2) and the objections contain no factual allegations in support of Plaintiff's conclusory root-canal-related contention (see generally Doc. 5). Accordingly, any such claim fails.
The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is dismissed. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.