From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Detroit Police Dep't

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 19, 2024
No. 24-11524 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2024)

Opinion

24-11524

11-19-2024

BERNARD ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al. Defendants.


ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Robert J. White United States District Judge

On October 29, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute as to Defendant “Officer Lupin,” ECF No. 1, PageID.2, who has yet to be served in this case. On November 12, 2024, Plaintiff responded to the Court's order, which the Court reproduces here in its entirety:

This is a police brutality case. To the best of Plaintiff's knowledge, the two officers involved are the ones listed in the complaint. Plaintiff has successfully completed service on the other defendants. When Plaintiff's process servers, however, attempted service on Officer Lupin, they were told that the surname was incorrect and service would not be accepted for her. Officer Lupin's real name is Officer Luna. Accordingly, Plaintiff respectfully requests this Court allow him to amend his complaint, correctly naming Officer Luna, and issue a new summons for Officer Luna.
ECF No. 9, PageID.53.

Plaintiff has provided good cause to vacate the show cause order. But to the extent Plaintiff seeks to amend his complaint, his filing falls short. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), “a party may amend its pleading” beyond “21 days after service of a responsive pleading” “only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave.” If the former is given, Plaintiff can submit a proposed stipulated order to that effect; if it isn't, Plaintiff can move for leave to amend. See, e.g., Toyee v. Sterling Heights Police Dept., No. 20-10542, 2020 WL 7056041, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 1, 2020) (addressing a motion for leave to amend the complaint “to correct the name of two of the defendant officers”). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Court's order to show cause (ECF No. 8) is VACATED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that with 14 days of this Order, Plaintiff shall either (1) submit via CM/ECF Utilities a proposed stipulated order to amend the complaint, or (2) file on the docket a motion for leave to amend the complaint.


Summaries of

Allen v. Detroit Police Dep't

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 19, 2024
No. 24-11524 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Allen v. Detroit Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 19, 2024

Citations

No. 24-11524 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 19, 2024)