From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Davis

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 18, 2021
1:21CV8 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2021)

Opinion

1:21CV8

08-18-2021

DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR. Plaintiff, v. KELDA S. DAVIS, Defendant.


ORDER

Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 9, 2021, was served on the parties in this action. (Docs. 4, 5.) Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 6.) It is obvious from Plaintiff's stock objection that he has not bothered to read the Recommendation, as the Recommendation bases its decision on one of the very grounds that Plaintiff claims the court failed to consider.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objections were made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as well as for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.


Summaries of

Allen v. Davis

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Aug 18, 2021
1:21CV8 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Allen v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK M. ALLEN, SR. Plaintiff, v. KELDA S. DAVIS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

1:21CV8 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2021)

Citing Cases

Allen v. Davis

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Allen v. Davis, No.…