From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Corr. Corp. of America Emps.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 15, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01992-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01992-CMA-MJW

12-15-2011

SHAWN D. ALLEN, Plaintiff(s), v. CORRECTIONS CORP. OF AMERICA EMPLOYEES, J. GRAY, N. ARREDONDO, LT. PHILLIPS, and C. BLAKE, Defendant(s).


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe

It is hereby ORDERED that the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and Brief in Support (docket no. 83) is DENIED pursuant to Motley v. Marathon Oil Co., 71 F.3d 1547, 1550 (10th Cir. 1995), cert denied, 517 U.S. 1190 (1996)(quoting Martinez v. Schock Transfer & Warehouse Co., 789 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir. 1986) which states: "Generally, 'control of discovery is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial courts, and a denial of a motion to compel discovery will not be disturbed absent abuse of discretion.'" The subject motion is also denied for those reasons as outlined in the response (docket no 90), that I incorporate by reference. I further find that Defendants have fully responded to the Pro Se Incarcerated Plaintiff's discovery requests.


Summaries of

Allen v. Corr. Corp. of America Emps.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 15, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01992-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Allen v. Corr. Corp. of America Emps.

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN D. ALLEN, Plaintiff(s), v. CORRECTIONS CORP. OF AMERICA EMPLOYEES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01992-CMA-MJW (D. Colo. Dec. 15, 2011)