From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 29, 2022
No. 3923-22 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

3923-22

09-29-2022

ALBERT J. ALLEN & KATHRYN S. MAEGLIN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge.

On June 13, 2022, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction as to Petitioner Kathryn S. Maeglin, on the ground that no statutory notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been sent to petitioner Kathryn S. Maeglin with respect to taxable year 2018, nor had respondent made any other determination with respect to Kathryn S. Maeglin's tax year 2018 that would confer jurisdiction on this Court, as of the date the petition herein was filed. Although the Court directed petitioners to file an objection, if any, to respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioners have failed to do so. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss For Lack of Jurisdiction as to Petitioner Kathryn S. Maeglin is granted. This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Kathryn S. Maeglin, and references in the petition to Kathryn S. Maeglin are deemed stricken. It is further

ORDERED that the caption of this case is amended to read "Albert J. Allen, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent".


Summaries of

Allen v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Sep 29, 2022
No. 3923-22 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Allen v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT J. ALLEN & KATHRYN S. MAEGLIN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

No. 3923-22 (U.S.T.C. Sep. 29, 2022)