From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 5, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00657-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00657-LTB

12-05-2011

EDWARD ALLEN, Applicant, v. TOM CLEMENTS, and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents.


ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Babcock, Senior Judge

Applicant has submitted a Motion for Permission to Appeal, which has been processed as a Notice of Appeal. Applicant previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because applicant has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 5th day of December, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

Lewis T. Babcock

SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO


Summaries of

Allen v. Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 5, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-00657-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Allen v. Clements

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD ALLEN, Applicant, v. TOM CLEMENTS, and JOHN SUTHERS, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 5, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00657-LTB (D. Colo. Dec. 5, 2011)