From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Clark County Detention Center

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 15, 2011
2:10-cv-857-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2011)

Opinion

2:10-cv-857-RLH-GWF.

August 15, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court is an Order (#141) entered by the Honorable George W. Foley regarding Plaintiff Allen's Motion to Appoint Counsel (#108).

Defendant Naphcare, Inc., filed an Objection to Judge Foley's Order #141 (#148, filed May 27, 2011) in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Plaintiff filed a Response (#149) to the Objection, Defendant filed a Reply (#150), and this matter was referred for consideration.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order of Magistrate Judge Foley is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge *'s Order (#141), appointing counsel for Plaintiff in this action only, is AFFIRMED, Defendant's Objection (#148) is overruled, and counsel is appointed as ordered by Judge Foley.


Summaries of

Allen v. Clark County Detention Center

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 15, 2011
2:10-cv-857-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Allen v. Clark County Detention Center

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LEE ALLEN, Plaintiff(s), v. CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 15, 2011

Citations

2:10-cv-857-RLH-GWF (D. Nev. Aug. 15, 2011)