Opinion
September 30, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.).
Judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Upon a careful review of the record, we conclude that the Planning Board, as lead agency, reasonably exercised its discretion in issuing a declaration that the proposed construction would have no significant effect on the environment, thus obviating the need for an environmental impact statement (Southampton Assn. v Planning Bd., 109 A.D.2d 204, 206).
We have reviewed petitioners' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.