From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
NO. C00-4599 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

NO. C00-4599 TEH NO. C11-5498 RS

11-23-2011

DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants. TIMOTHY SCOTT CAMPBELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Respondents.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RELATE CASES

These matters come before this Court on the Campbell plaintiffs' administrative motion to determine whether Campbell v. City of Oakland, Case No. C11-5498 RS, is related to Allen v. City of Oakland, Case No. 00-4599 TEH; Coles v. City of Oakland, Case No. 03-2961 TEH; Local 10, International Longshore and Warehouse Union v. City of Oakland, Case No. 03-2962 TEH; and Spalding v. City of Oakland, C11-2867 TEH. After carefully considering both the moving papers and the timely opposition filed by the City of Oakland, the Court concludes that these cases are not related.

Civil Local Rule 3-12(a) defines cases to be related if they "concern substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event," and "[i]t appears likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different Judges." These cases do not satisfy either part of this definition. First, while there is some overlap in defendants, none of the plaintiffs in Campbell are or were plaintiffs in any of the other cases. Nor do any of the cases before this Court concern the same events that form the basis of the complaint in Campbell. Second, the Campbell plaintiffs have failed to persuade the Court that there is likely to be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if this Court does not preside over the Campbell litigation. While there may well be some overlap in issues, that is not the test for relating cases; indeed, implicit in Civil Local Rule 3-12(a) is the principle that single judges of this Court do not become responsible for all cases arising in one area of law, even when some of the same parties are involved. Thus, for example, although this Court oversees reforms in the Oakland Police Department in Allen, and those reforms include issues related to use of force and internal affairs investigations, it is not this Court's province to relate all cases that allege excessive use of force by Oakland police officers or all cases involving allegations on which the Department has conducted an internal affairs investigation.

In light of all of the above, the Court does not find Campbell to be related, as defined by Civil Local Rule 3-12, to any of the four cases over which this Court has presided. The Campbell plaintiffs' motion is therefore DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Allen v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 23, 2011
NO. C00-4599 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Allen v. City of Oakland

Case Details

Full title:DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

NO. C00-4599 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)