From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
MASTER CASE FILE NO. C00-4599 TEH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

MASTER CASE FILE NO. C00-4599 TEH

03-25-2013

DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

The Monitor has informed the Court that he continues to receive inquiries concerning confidential information that was reported in the press last fall. Because the matter was sealed by the Court, the Monitor has been unable to respond to these inquiries, which has led to an inference that the matter remains unresolved. The Court now clarifies for the record that the matter was fully investigated, and that nothing in the investigation has in any way diminished the Court's confidence in the Monitor's professionalism or his ability to perform his duties. The details of the information and the investigation remain confidential and under seal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Allen v. City of Oakland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
MASTER CASE FILE NO. C00-4599 TEH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Allen v. City of Oakland

Case Details

Full title:DELPHINE ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

MASTER CASE FILE NO. C00-4599 TEH (N.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)