From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. City of Antioch

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 26, 2024
23-cv-01895-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-01895-VC

08-26-2024

TRENT ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE BIFURCATION AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Re: Dkt. No. 142

VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The defendants' motion to bifurcate and stay discovery relating to municipal and apex-supervisory liability is denied. Although bifurcation of such claims is sometimes a good idea in police cases, it's a bad idea here. The allegations relating to municipal liability are particularly detailed, and some of the evidence adduced to date supports those allegations. It's difficult to imagine that comprehensive discovery relating to municipal liability won't eventually be needed in this case. And even if a subset of plaintiffs is ultimately unable to establish a constitutional violation, the scope of discovery on municipal liability would not change dramatically. Accordingly, moving forward promptly with this discovery is in the interests of justice. The possibility of bifurcating trials can be discussed at a later stage.

Regarding tomorrow's case management conference, the Court is inclined to set pretrial deadlines for all of the plaintiffs' cases, to be divided in roughly four groups. The Court is contemplating the following dates:

Group 1

Fact Discovery Cutoff

April 4, 2025

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions

May 22, 2025

Trials

Beginning in September 2025

Group 2

Fact Discovery Cutoff

June 6, 2025

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions

August 14, 2025

Trials

Beginning in January 2026

Group 3

Fact Discovery Cutoff

October 3, 2025

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions

December 4, 2025

Trials

Beginning in May 2026

Group 4

Fact Discovery Cutoff

December 17, 2025

Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions

February 26, 2026

Trials

Beginning in September 2026

The parties should be prepared to discuss these dates, as well as which plaintiffs should go in which group, and why.

There is also a disconnect between the Plaintiffs' CMS and the First Amended Complaint in that the FAC lists more officers for each plaintiff than the CMS's proposed groupings. Plaintiffs should be prepared to discuss whether they plan to dismiss certain officers from the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. City of Antioch

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 26, 2024
23-cv-01895-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Allen v. City of Antioch

Case Details

Full title:TRENT ALLEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 26, 2024

Citations

23-cv-01895-VC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 26, 2024)