From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allen v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1642 DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1642 DAD.

February 2, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff's counsel has attempted to set plaintiff's motion for summary judgment for hearing before the court merely by way of docket entry. He is not permitted to do so. A party desiring oral argument in this social security case must file a request for argument. The request must be filed at the time specified in the court's June 16, 2009 scheduling order, must identify the issues on which oral argument is desired, and must explain why oral argument would be helpful. If the request is granted, the party's motion will be set for hearing on a regularly scheduled law and motion calendar. Thus, plaintiff's summary judgment motion (Doc. No. 18) will not be placed on the June 16, 2010 calendar for hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allen v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1642 DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Allen v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GRACE ALLEN, on behalf of LANISHA LEE ANNA ALLEN, a minor, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1642 DAD (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2010)