From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alleghany Co. v. Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1902
42 S.E. 331 (N.C. 1902)

Opinion

(Filed 9 September, 1902.)

1. INJUNCTION — Restraining Order — Timber.

Where, in an action to try title to timber land, the trial judge finds as a fact that there is a bona fide contention on both sides, based upon evidence, and that the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case, such issue should be submitted to a jury, and could not be determined on a motion to continue an order restraining the cutting of timber.

2. INJUNCTIONS — Laws 1901, Ch. 666.

An order restraining trespass on timber lands was properly continued until the hearing, under Laws 1901, ch. 666.

ACTION by the Alleghany Company against the East Coast Lumber Company and others, heard by Judge George H. Brown, at chambers, at Washington, N.C. 28 January, 1902. From an order continuing a preliminary injunction restraining the cutting of timber the defendants appealed.

Rodman Rodman and Small McLean for the (7) plaintiff.

E. F. Aydlett and F. H. Busbee for the defendant.


It is admitted that the defendants are cutting timber around the southern side of Endless Bay; and if the head of the northeast prong of Long Shoal River is located as contended by plaintiff, then (for the purposes of this motion only) it is further admitted that said cutting is being done upon the lands described in the complaint and covered by the John Hall grant.

There is a bona fide and serious contention as to the true location of the head of the northeast prong of Long Shoal River, upon the determination of which rests the location of the John Hall grant, under which plaintiff claims, and defendants do not, and which grant, if located by plaintiff's contention, covers the locus in quo. This contention, which is supported by affidavits of each party in favor of its own view, cannot be decided upon this motion, but must be submitted to a jury.

His Honor, having correctly found as a fact that "there is a bona fide contention on both sides, based upon evidence," and that the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case, could not, under chapter 666, Laws 1901, do otherwise than continue the restraining order to the hearing.

No error.

(8)


Summaries of

Alleghany Co. v. Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1902
42 S.E. 331 (N.C. 1902)
Case details for

Alleghany Co. v. Lumber Co.

Case Details

Full title:ALLEGHANY COMPANY v. EAST COAST LUMBER COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1902

Citations

42 S.E. 331 (N.C. 1902)
42 S.E. 331

Citing Cases

Lodge v. Ijames

In same opinion it is further said: "On such hearings the title is not required to be proved with that…