From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allbritton v. Logan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-CV-1381-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1381-DMC-P

09-28-2021

HAROLD ALLBRITTON, Plaintiff, v. LOGAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, this case was not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed. The parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and the Court now finds that assignment of a District Judge is necessary to properly address the case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge and to update the docket to reflect the new case number.


Summaries of

Allbritton v. Logan

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 28, 2021
2:21-CV-1381-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Allbritton v. Logan

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD ALLBRITTON, Plaintiff, v. LOGAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-1381-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2021)