From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allard v. KIA Am., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 17, 2024
SACV 24-00036-SPG-JDE (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)

Opinion

SACV 24-00036-SPG-JDE

04-17-2024

Todd Allard et al v. KIA America, Inc. et al


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Plaintiffs are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs to show cause, in writing, on or before April 30, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 90 days of the filing of the Complaint on the following Defendant:

Kia America, Inc.

Plaintiffs can satisfy this order by showing that service was effectuated within the 90 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to do so. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Allard v. KIA Am., Inc.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 17, 2024
SACV 24-00036-SPG-JDE (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Allard v. KIA Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Todd Allard et al v. KIA America, Inc. et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 17, 2024

Citations

SACV 24-00036-SPG-JDE (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)