From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allah v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 27, 2020
Case No. EDCV 17-01748 JAK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. May. 27, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 17-01748 JAK (RAO)

05-27-2020

RATEEK ALLAH, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR RUTLEDGE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 30), all of the other records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. DATED: May 27, 2020

/s/_________

JOHN A. KRONSTADT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Allah v. Rutledge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 27, 2020
Case No. EDCV 17-01748 JAK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. May. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Allah v. Rutledge

Case Details

Full title:RATEEK ALLAH, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR RUTLEDGE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 27, 2020

Citations

Case No. EDCV 17-01748 JAK (RAO) (C.D. Cal. May. 27, 2020)