From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allah v. Littlefield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 26, 2012
Civ. No. 1:12-CV-1179 (MAD/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1:12-CV-1179 (MAD/RFT)

07-26-2012

PRINCE SHALEAK GOD ALLAH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT E. LITTLEFIELD; HELENA H. ROLAND; and GARY F. STIGLMEIR, Defendants.

PRINCE SHALEAK GOD ALLAH Plaintiff, Pro Se


APPEARANCES:

PRINCE SHALEAK GOD ALLAH
Plaintiff, Pro Se

OF COUNSEL: RANDOLPH F. TREECE
United States Magistrate Judge

REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER

The Clerk has sent to the Court a Complaint, together with an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (IFP), filed by pro se Plaintiff Prince Shaleak God Allah. Dkt. No. 1, Compl; Dkt. No. 2, Mot. for IFP. Because the pleading filed by Plaintiff fails to satisfy basic pleading requirements, as more fully discussed below, this Court recommends dismissal, or, in the alternative, in light of his pro se status, an order be issued directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint should he wish to avoid dismissal of this action.

I. DISCUSSION


A. In Forma Pauperis Application

Accompanying Plaintiff's Complaint is a Motion for Leave to Proceed with this Action In Forma Pauperis. Dkt. No. 2. After reviewing that Application, the Court finds that Plaintiff may properly proceed with this matter in forma pauperis.

B. Rules Governing Pleading Requirements

Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a pleading which sets forth a clam for relief shall contain, inter alia, "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." See FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2). The purpose of this Rule "is to give fair notice of the claim being asserted so as to permit the adverse party the opportunity to file a responsive answer [and] prepare an adequate defense." Hudson v. Artuz, 1998 WL 832708, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 1998) (quoting Powell v. Marine Midland Bank, 162 F.R.D. 15, 16 (N.D.N.Y. 1995) (McAvoy) (other citations omitted)). Rule 8 also provides that a pleading must contain:

(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction . . .;
(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and
(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.
FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a).

Moreover, Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in part:

(b) Paragraphs; Separate Statements. A party must state its claims or defenses in numbered paragraphs, each limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances. A later pleading may refer by number to a paragraph in an earlier pleading. If doing so would promote clarity, each claim founded on a separate transaction or occurrence - and each defense other than a denial - must be stated in a separate count or defense.
FED. R. CIV. P. 10(b).

The purpose of Rule 10 is to "provide an easy mode of identification for referring to a particular paragraph in a prior pleading[.]" Sandler v. Capanna, 1992 WL 392597, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 1992 (citing 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1323 at 735 (1990)).

A complaint that fails to comply with these Rules presents too heavy a burden for the defendant in shaping a comprehensive defense, provides no meaningful basis for a court to assess the sufficiency of a plaintiff's claims, and may properly be dismissed by the court. Gonzales v. Wing, 167 F.R.D. 352, 355 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) (McAvoy). As the Second Circuit has stated, "[w]hen a complaint does not comply with the requirement that it be short and plain, the Court has the power, on its own initiative, . . . to dismiss the complaint." Salhuddin v. Cuomo, 861 F.2d 40, 42 (2d Cir. 1988). "Dismissal, however, is usually reserved for those cases in which the complaint is so confused, ambiguous, vague, or otherwise unintelligble that its true substance, if any, is well disguised." Hudson v. Artuz, 1998 WL 832708, at *2 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). In those cases in which the court dismisses a pro se complaint for failure to comply with these Rules, it should afford the plaintiff leave to amend the complaint to state a claim that is on its face nonfrivolous. See Simmons v. Abruzzo, 49 F.3d 83, 86-87 (2d Cir. 1995).

C. Plaintiff's Complaint

A review of the Complaint reveals that such pleading clearly fails to satisfy the requirements of the above-mentioned Federal Rules. Plaintiff purportedly brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and perhaps even the Americans with Disabilities Act. See Compl. at ¶ 5. However, it is not clear who the named Defendants are, what constitutional rights he is seeking to vindicate and how the named Defendants violated such rights, what disability he is suffering from and how the Defendants discriminated against him, nor is there a clear request for relief. In fact, the Complaint is entirely bereft of any information that would allow this Court to comprehend why Plaintiff has sought Court intervention.

Since Plaintiff's Complaint plainly does not comply with the requirements of the above-mentioned pleading rules, and in its current form, the pleading fails to state a cause of action, we recommend that dismissal is appropriate. However, in light of his pro se status, we alternatively recommend that the District Judge provide Plaintiff an opportunity to amend his pleading to cure the deficiencies outlined above, with the warning that failure to submit an amended pleading will result in dismissal of this action.

Should Plaintiff be directed by the District Judge to file an amended complaint, we offer the following guidance. Any such amended complaint, which shall supersede and replace in its entirety the previous Complaint filed by Plaintiff, must contain a caption that clearly identifies, by name, each individual that Plaintiff is suing in the present lawsuit and must bear the case number assigned to this action. Plaintiff must also clearly state the nature of the suit and the basis for this Court's jurisdiction. The body of Plaintiff's amended complaint must contain sequentially numbered paragraphs containing only one act of misconduct per paragraph. Thus, if Plaintiff claims that his civil and/or constitutional rights were violated by more than one Defendant, or on more than one occasion, he should include a corresponding number of paragraphs in his amended complaint for each such allegation, with each paragraph specifying (i) the alleged act of misconduct; (ii) the date on which such misconduct occurred; (iii) the names of each and every individual who participated in such misconduct; (iv) where appropriate, the location where the alleged misconduct occurred; and, (v) the nexus between such misconduct and Plaintiff's civil and/or constitutional rights.

Plaintiff's amended complaint shall also assert claims against each and every Defendant named in such complaint; any Defendant not named in such pleading shall not be a Defendant in the instant action. Plaintiff is further cautioned that no portion of any prior complaint shall be incorporated into his amended complaint by reference. Plaintiff shall state in the single amended complaint all claims that he wishes this Court to consider as a basis for awarding Plaintiff relief herein; his failure to file such a pleading will result in dismissal of this action without further Order of the Court.

WHEREFORE, it is hereby

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed with this Action In Forma Pauperis, (Dkt. No. 2) is granted; and it is further

Plaintiff should note that although the Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis has been granted, he will still be required to pay other fees that he may incur in this action, including copying and/or witness fees.

RECOMMENDED, that this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff's failure to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10; and it is further

RECOMMENDED, that in light of Plaintiff's pro se status, prior to any dismissal, Plaintiff be afforded an opportunity to amend his Complaint consistent with the instructions above. In any amended complaint that Plaintiff files, he must comply with Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any other terms the Court deems proper. Plaintiff must also allege claims of misconduct or wrongdoing against Defendants that he has a legal right to pursue and over which this Court has jurisdiction; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Report-Recommendation and Order on Plaintiff by certified mail.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties have fourteen (14) days within which to file written objections to the foregoing report. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court. FAILURE TO OBJECT TO THIS REPORT WITHIN FOUTEEN (14) DAYS WILL PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW. Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir. 1993) (citing Small v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72 & 6(a). Date: July 26, 2012

Albany, New York

_________________

RANDOLPH F. TREECE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Allah v. Littlefield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 26, 2012
Civ. No. 1:12-CV-1179 (MAD/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Allah v. Littlefield

Case Details

Full title:PRINCE SHALEAK GOD ALLAH, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT E. LITTLEFIELD; HELENA H…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 26, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 1:12-CV-1179 (MAD/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 26, 2012)