From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Allah v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2014
118 A.D.3d 1507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-06-20

In the Matter of Khalaire ALLAH, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent–Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered February 4, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition. Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Leah R. Nowotarski of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered February 4, 2013 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition.
Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Leah R. Nowotarski of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (William E. Storrs of Counsel), for Respondent–Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination after a tier III hearing that he violated inmate rule 113.26 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][14][xvi] ). On appeal from the judgment dismissing the petition, petitioner contends that the record is insufficient to permit judicial review because respondent failed to provide a copy of recorded conversations between petitioner and a third party. That contention is not properly before us inasmuch as it is raised for the first time on appeal ( see Zelnik v. Bidermann Indus. U.S.A., 242 A.D.2d 227, 232, 662 N.Y.S.2d 19) and, in any event, we conclude that it is without merit. Finally, petitioner's procedural objections, including his due process challenges, are not preserved for our review inasmuch as he did not raise those issues at the hearing ( see Matter of Jones v. Fischer, 111 A.D.3d 1362, 1363, 974 N.Y.S.2d 220), and he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to them because he did not raise them on his administrative appeal ( see Matter of Nelson v. Coughlin, 188 A.D.2d 1071, 1071, 591 N.Y.S.2d 670,appeal dismissed 81 N.Y.2d 834, 595 N.Y.S.2d 396, 611 N.E.2d 297).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, and VALENTINO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Allah v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2014
118 A.D.3d 1507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Allah v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Khalaire ALLAH, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Brian FISCHER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 20, 2014

Citations

118 A.D.3d 1507 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
118 A.D.3d 1507
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4680

Citing Cases

Hawley v. Annucci

Johnson v Fischer, 109 AD3d 1070, 1071), that directive is inapplicable here because petitioner was being…

Hawley v. Annucci

spital when his cell was searched, and he was therefore not "removed from his cell for the purpose of…