From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alignment Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 28, 2020
68 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

Opinion

2018-1649 K C

08-28-2020

ALIGNMENT CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., as Assignee of Frantz Lindor, Respondent, v. TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INS. CO., Appellant.

Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Michael Rappaport of counsel), for appellant. Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Jung Pryjma of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Michael Rappaport of counsel), for appellant.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Jung Pryjma of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, WAVNY TOUSSAINT, JJ.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals, as limited by the brief, from so much an order of the Civil Court as denied defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff's assignor had procured the insurance policy in question by making a material misrepresentation as to the ownership and use of the vehicle in question.

"A misrepresentation is material if the insurer would not have issued the policy had it known the facts misrepresented. To establish materiality as a matter of law, the insurer must present documentation concerning its underwriting practices, such as underwriting manuals, bulletins, or rules pertaining to similar risks, that show that it would not have issued the same policy if the correct information had been disclosed in the application" ( Interboro Ins. Co. v. Fatmir , 89 A.D.3d 993, 994 [2011] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted] ).

Upon a review of the record, we find that defendant failed to establish as a matter of law that it would not have issued the policy in question. Consequently, defendant did not demonstrate, prima facie, that the misrepresentation by plaintiff's assignor was material (see Commitment Care, P.T., P.C. v. Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co. , 64 Misc. 3d 136[A], 2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51157[U] [App. Term, 2d Dept., 2d, 11th & 13th Jud. Dists 2019] ).

Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., ELLIOT and TOUSSAINT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alignment Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Aug 28, 2020
68 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
Case details for

Alignment Chiropractic, P.C. v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Alignment Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Frantz Lindor, Respondent, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Aug 28, 2020

Citations

68 Misc. 3d 131 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 50994
130 N.Y.S.3d 192

Citing Cases

Concord Direct, Inc. v. Ameriprise Ins. Co.

In any event, defendant did not demonstrate that the purported misrepresentation was material, as the…