From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ALI v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2007
No. CIV S-02-0937 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-0937 MCE KJM P.

August 22, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances at this time. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 10, 2007 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

ALI v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 22, 2007
No. CIV S-02-0937 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2007)
Case details for

ALI v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Case Details

Full title:JUMAH ABDULLAHI THOMAS MOORE ALI, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 22, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-02-0937 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2007)