From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ali v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-01366 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-01366 DAD P

07-09-2012

AZIZ YASIR AZIM ALI, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

On May 31, 2012, the court ordered petitioner to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the required filing fee within thirty days. The court cautioned petitioner that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAD:9
ali1366.fifp


Summaries of

Ali v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-01366 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Ali v. California

Case Details

Full title:AZIZ YASIR AZIM ALI, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-01366 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)