From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alger v. McDowell

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 29, 2022
No. 19-12889 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2022)

Opinion

19-12889

06-29-2022

JOSHUA L. ALGER, SR. Plaintiff, v. MCDOWELL, et al., Defendants.


Curtis Ivy, Jr. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 74) AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 1)

Shalina D. Kumar United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, brought this civil rights action against several individuals working at the Kinross Correctional Facility (KCF) where he was incarcerated in 2016. ECF No. 1. This case was referred to the assigned magistrate judge for all pretrial purposes. ECF No. 20.

On May 12, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R). ECF No. 74. The R&R recommends that the Court dismiss plaintiff's complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because plaintiff had neither responded to the Court's order to show cause (ECF No. 60), nor provided an updated address. Neither party has filed an objection to the R&R.

The Court has reviewed the record and the R&R is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Alger v. McDowell

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 29, 2022
No. 19-12889 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Alger v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA L. ALGER, SR. Plaintiff, v. MCDOWELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 29, 2022

Citations

No. 19-12889 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 29, 2022)