From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. C 11-0301 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 11-0301 CW Case No. CV11-3956 TEH

10-18-2011

BRIAN ALGEE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant. FAINE DAVIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

MICHELLE B. HEVERLY, Bar No. 178660 TOMOMI GLOVER, Bar No. 244886 LITTLER MENDELSON Attorneys for Defendant NORDSTROM, INC.


MICHELLE B. HEVERLY, Bar No. 178660

TOMOMI GLOVER, Bar No. 244886

LITTLER MENDELSON

Attorneys for Defendant NORDSTROM, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES AND SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULES ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED OR SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER

(Docket Nos. 32 and 35 in 11-301; Docket No. 9 in 11-3956)

Civil L.R. 3-12

The Court, having considered Defendant Nordstrom, Inc.'s Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Case Should Be Related and all supporting documents presented before the Court, any opposition thereto, and all prior pleadings and proceedings had herein, hereby orders as follows:

Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc., CV11-0301, and Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc., case number CV11-3956, shall be related and conducted before Judge Wilken. A case management conference shall be held in each case on December 8, 2011. Case management statements must be filed no less than seven days prior to that date, in accordance with the Local Rules.

Defendant's pending Motion to Compel Arbitration, Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc., Docket No. 9, need not be re-noticed before this Court. The Court sets the following briefing and hearing schedule for this motion:

1. Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Compel Arbitration is due by October 31, 2011.
2. Defendant's Reply in further support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration is due by November 7, 2011.
3. The motion hearing is set for Thursday, December 8, 2011.

On October 14, 2011, Defendant Nordstrom filed a Notice of Motion for Leave to File an Amended or Supplemental Answer in Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc., Docket No. 35, which set the hearing date for this motion to be November 15, 2011, less than thirty-five days after the date of the notice, in violation of Local Rule 7-2(a). Accordingly, the Court vacates the current hearing date and sets the following briefing and hearing schedule for this motion:

1. Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Leave to File an Amended or Supplemental Answer is due by October 31, 2011.
2. Defendant's Reply in further support of the Motion to Leave to File an Amended or Supplemental Answer is due by November 7, 2011.
3. The motion hearing is set for December 8, 2011.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. C 11-0301 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Algee v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN ALGEE, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 11-0301 CW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)