From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alfredo-Quinteros v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 14, 2011
No. C 11-1779 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-1779 PJH

10-14-2011

ANTONIO ALFREDO-QUINTEROS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Respondents are hereby ORDERED to file a supplemental return to the petition, no later than October 28, 2011, addressing the effect, if any, on the petition of (a) the Ninth Circuit's June 29, 2011 order affirming the denial of petitioner's motion to reopen removal proceedings (mandate issued August 25, 2011); and (b) the Ninth Circuit's decision in Diouf v. Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2011) (petition for en banc review denied, September 28, 2011; mandate issued October 6, 2011).

Petitioner may file a reply to the supplemental return, no later than November 10, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Alfredo-Quinteros v. Holder

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 14, 2011
No. C 11-1779 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Alfredo-Quinteros v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO ALFREDO-QUINTEROS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 14, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-1779 PJH (N.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2011)