From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alfred A. Freudenheim Co. v. E. Seaboard Steel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 30, 1952
280 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

September 30, 1952.

Present — Peck, P.J., Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


Service of the bill of particulars was a basis for renewal of the motion for an examination of defendants before trial but not a proper basis of the motion for reargument. The procedure was improper and tended to avoid consideration of the items on the merits. Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and the motion denied without prejudice to a new motion by plaintiff for examination before trial.


Summaries of

Alfred A. Freudenheim Co. v. E. Seaboard Steel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 30, 1952
280 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Alfred A. Freudenheim Co. v. E. Seaboard Steel

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED A. FREUDENHEIM CO., INC., Respondent, v. EASTERN SEABOARD STEEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)