Alford v. State

Full title: Roger ALFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Jun 23, 2020

601 S.W.3d 599 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 107963

06-23-2020

Roger ALFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Stephen P. Ranz, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin A. Moody, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Stephen P. Ranz, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Justin A. Moody, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Michael E. Gardner, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Roger Alford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).