From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alford v. Rice

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 28, 2011
Case Number: 3:10cv424 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case Number: 3:10cv424.

January 28, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on November 15, 2010 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). On November 29, 2010 a Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) was filed. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) and to the Supplemental Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12).

The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that the Recommendation and Supplemental Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly the complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Exhibit


Summaries of

Alford v. Rice

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jan 28, 2011
Case Number: 3:10cv424 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Alford v. Rice

Case Details

Full title:Brian K. Alford, Plaintiff(s), v. Judge Walter H. Rice, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jan 28, 2011

Citations

Case Number: 3:10cv424 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 28, 2011)

Citing Cases

Alford v. Schweitzer

He has been prohibited by this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis in…

Alford v. Schweitzer

Mr. Alford is prohibited by § 1915(g) from proceeding in forma pauperis in this case because at least three…