Alford v. Baylor

Full title: CRAIG ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. LEA BAYLOR, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 10, 2023

1:20-CV-01787 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 10, 2023)

Opinion

1:20-CV-01787

03-10-2023

CRAIG ALFORD, Plaintiff, v. LEA BAYLOR, et al., Defendants.

Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge

ORDER

Matthew W. Brann Chief United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 10^th day of March 2023, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 105) to compel discovery and for sanctions is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 110) for declaratory judgment is DENIED.

3. Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 112) for summary judgment is DENIED.

4. Plaintiff's duplicative motion (Doc. 127) seeking declaratory judgment and summary judgment based on Defendants' alleged failure to respond to his prior motions is DENIED.¹

1 In this motion, Plaintiff asserts that Defendants did not respond to his previous motions as ordered by the Court. That assertion is, of course, directly contradicted by the docket in this case. See Docs. 117, 118, 119, 120, 121.