From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alfaro v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Dec 15, 2021
19-22762-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Dec. 15, 2021)

Summary

awarding costs to a defendant that prevailed on a motion to dismiss on non-jurisdictional grounds

Summary of this case from Clowdus v. Am. Airlines, Inc.

Opinion

19-22762-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN

12-15-2021

CARLOS ALFARO; and HENRIETTA I. EGBUNIKE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MARCIA G. COOKE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman's Report and Recommendation on Defendants' Motion For Bill of Costs (ECF No. 203). Judge Goodman recommends that the Court GRANT in part Defendants' Motion and award Defendants $8, 076.99 in taxable costs. Neither Party objected to the Report and the time to do so has passed.

The Court has reviewed the Motion, Judge Goodman's Report, and the relevant legal authorities. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS and ADOPTS Judge Goodman's Report as the Order of this Court (ECF No. 203) and GRANTS in part Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 196). The Court AWARDS Defendants $8, 076.99 in taxable costs.

DONE and ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Alfaro v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Dec 15, 2021
19-22762-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Dec. 15, 2021)

awarding costs to a defendant that prevailed on a motion to dismiss on non-jurisdictional grounds

Summary of this case from Clowdus v. Am. Airlines, Inc.
Case details for

Alfaro v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ALFARO; and HENRIETTA I. EGBUNIKE, on behalf of themselves and all…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

19-22762-Civ-COOKE/GOODMAN (S.D. Fla. Dec. 15, 2021)

Citing Cases

Regueiro v. Am. Airlines Inc.

Defendant argues generally that videorecorded depositions, such as those at issue here, are necessary to…

Phillipe v. Zimmer U.S., Inc.

Since Defendant has not met its burden to provide sufficient detail to justify the costs related to the…