From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alfano v. Arthur Finnegan Post 1443, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1998
250 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

There is no merit to the plaintiffs' contention that the jury verdict, finding that the defendant's negligence was not a proximate cause of the injuries of the plaintiff Donna Alfano, is against the weight of the evidence. The verdict is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Lolik v. Big V Supermarkets, 86 N.Y.2d 744, 746; cf., Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129). Moreover, the plaintiffs' contention regarding the jury instruction on proximate cause is not preserved for appellate review (see, Rupert v. Sellers, 50 N.Y.2d 881, 882-883, cert denied 449 U.S. 901).

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alfano v. Arthur Finnegan Post 1443, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 4, 1998
250 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Alfano v. Arthur Finnegan Post 1443, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DONNA ALFANO et al., Appellants, v. ARTHUR FINNEGAN POST 1443, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 4, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 980

Citing Cases

Meade v. Hisler

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff's contention that the Supreme Court should…