From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexandre v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1990
168 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 10, 1990

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Weisberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

In June 1983 the claimant was convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree stemming from the discovery of a nine-millimeter pistol beneath the counter behind which he was standing at the grocery store where he worked. He was incarcerated pursuant to the conviction, but the conviction was reversed by this court on the ground that the circumstantial evidence presented by the People did not exclude alternate reasonable explanations for the presence of the gun consistent with the defendant's innocence (see, People v. Alexander, 111 A.D.2d 177). The defendant was released from prison on May 20, 1985.

In August 1985 the claimant brought the instant claim, and after a nonjury trial, judgment was entered in favor of the State. We now affirm.

It was the claimant's burden to prove that he was innocent of the underlying charge by clear and convincing evidence (see, Court of Claims Act § 8-b). Contrary to the claimant's contentions, the proof he submitted, being equivocal and open to opposing inferences, did not meet his burden of proof.

In view of our determination, we need not address the other contentions raised by the claimant. Lawrence, J.P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alexandre v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 10, 1990
168 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Alexandre v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACQUES ALEXANDRE, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 472 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 712

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. State of New York

It is claimant's burden to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that he is innocent of the underlying…

VERA v. STATE OF NEW YORK

The evidence cannot be equivocal, contradictory or open to opposing inferences. See Acosta v State of New…