Opinion
2:22-cv-02051-CDS-EJY
02-21-2023
KEVIN ALEXANDER, an individual; and ALMA ALEXANDER, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. THE CROIX TOWNHOMES LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; GAINES INVESTMENT TRUST, a limited liability company; DONALD B. GAINES, CO TRUSTEE of the GAINES INVESTMENT TRUST; PAM GAINES, CO-TRUSTEE of the GAINES INVESTMENT TRUST; LIZBETH ESTRADA, an individual; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive. Defendants.
HOLLEY DRIGGS F. THOMAS EDWARDS, ESQ. JESSICA M. LUJAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants The Croix Townhomes LLC; Donald B. Gaines, Co- Trustee of the Gaines Investment Trust; and Lizbeth Estrada. ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD. ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs.
HOLLEY DRIGGS F. THOMAS EDWARDS, ESQ. JESSICA M. LUJAN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants The Croix Townhomes LLC; Donald B. Gaines, Co- Trustee of the Gaines Investment Trust; and Lizbeth Estrada.
ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD. ALEXIS L. BROWN, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ANTISLAPP MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 17) (FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants The Croix Townhomes LLC (“Croix”), Donald B. Gaines, Co-Trustee of the Gaines Investment Trust (“D. Gaines”), and Lizbeth Estrada (“Estrada”) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through the law firm of Holley Driggs, and Plaintiffs Kevin Alexander and Alma Alexander (together, “Plaintiffs”), by and through the law firm of Alexis Brown Law, Chtd., hereby STIPULATE and agree as follows pursuant to LR-IA 6-1:
1. The parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their reply in support of their anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) by two weeks, to March 7, 2023. This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline, and this stipulation is not meant to cause undue delay. See LR-IA 6-1(a).
2. The reason for the extension is to accommodate scheduling issues for counsel for Defendants and to ensure anti-SLAPP issues are adequately briefed for the Court.
3. The parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to grant this two-week extension for Defendants to file their reply in support of the anti-SLAPP motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.