From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. The Croix Townhomes LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 3, 2023
2:22-cv-02051-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02051-CDS-EJY

02-03-2023

KEVIN ALEXANDER, an individual; and ALMA ALEXANDER, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. THE CROIX TOWNHOMES LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; GAINES INVESTMENT TRUST, a limited liability company; DONALD B. GAINES, COTRUSTEE of the GAINES INVESTMENT TRUST; PAM GAINES, CO-TRUSTEE of the GAINES INVESTMENT TRUST; LIZBETH ESTRADA an individual; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, Defendants.

ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD. Alexis L. Brown Attorney for Plaintiffs HOLLEY DRIGGS Jessica M. Lujan F. Thomas Edwards (No. 9549), Jessica M. Lujan (No. 14913) Attorneys for Defendants


ALEXIS BROWN LAW, CHTD. Alexis L. Brown Attorney for Plaintiffs

HOLLEY DRIGGS Jessica M. Lujan F. Thomas Edwards (No. 9549), Jessica M. Lujan (No. 14913)

Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 17)

(FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiffs Kevin Alexander and Alma Alexander, by and through the law firm Alexis Brown Law, Chtd. and Defendants The Croix Townhomes LLC, Gaines Investment Trust, Donald B. Gaines, Co-Trustee of the Gaines Investment Trust, and Lizbeth Estrada, by and through the law firm of Holley Driggs hereby STIPULATE and agree as follows pursuant to LR-IA 6-1(a):

1. A Special Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.660 (ANTI-SLAPP) (ECF 17) (the “Motion to Dismiss”) was filed on January 23, 2023, making the Plaintiffs' response due February 6, 2023.

2. Illness is impeding counsel's ability to respond to the Motion to Dismiss by the current deadline of February 6, 2023.

3. The parties agree to extend the deadline for the Plaintiffs to respond to the Motion to Dismiss by one week, to February 13, 2023.

4. This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline, and this stipulation is not meant to cause undue delay.

5. The parties respectfully submit that good cause exists to grant this one-week extension for the Plaintiffs to respond to the Motion to Dismiss, which will not cause undue delay in this matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Alexander v. The Croix Townhomes LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 3, 2023
2:22-cv-02051-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Alexander v. The Croix Townhomes LLC

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN ALEXANDER, an individual; and ALMA ALEXANDER, an individual…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 3, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02051-CDS-EJY (D. Nev. Feb. 3, 2023)