From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 17, 2000
29 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED77804

Filed October 17, 2000

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE MICHAEL P. DAVID.

Nancy Vincent, 1221 Locust, Suite 350, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Karen Pope Butler, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER

Appellant David Alexander appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief entered in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court's determination was not clearly erroneous. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion reciting detailed facts and restating principles of law. We have, however, provided the parties with a memorandum opinion for their exclusive use detailing the reasons for this decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Alexander v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 17, 2000
29 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Alexander v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ALEXANDER, appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 17, 2000

Citations

29 S.W.3d 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Alexander v. State

The court denied Alexander's motion without an evidentiary hearing, and on October 17, 2000, we affirmed that…

Alexander v. State

The motion court denied the motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing, and we affirmed…