From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Seelbinder

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 3, 2022
167 N.Y.S.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

494 CA 21-01220

06-03-2022

Jeanne ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bonita SEELBINDER, Defendant-Appellant.

RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW A. LENHARD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FITZSIMMONS, NUNN & PLUKAS, LLP, ROCHESTER (JASON E. ABBOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.


RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW A. LENHARD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FITZSIMMONS, NUNN & PLUKAS, LLP, ROCHESTER (JASON E. ABBOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., NEMOYER, CURRAN, WINSLOW, AND BANNISTER, JJ.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Seelbinder

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 3, 2022
167 N.Y.S.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Alexander v. Seelbinder

Case Details

Full title:Jeanne ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Bonita SEELBINDER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 3, 2022

Citations

167 N.Y.S.3d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)