From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Santoro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
217 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 24, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, without costs or disbursements, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages only, unless within 30 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, the plaintiffs shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Orange County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict as to damages for (1) past pain and suffering from $100,000 to $10,000, (2) future pain and suffering from $125,000 to $60,000, and (3) loss of services from $2,500 to $2,000, and the entry of an amended judgment accordingly. In the event that the plaintiffs so stipulate, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, with costs to the defendants payable by the plaintiffs.

We find the damage award rendered after the retrial on damages deviated materially from what would be material compensation to the extent indicated (see, CPLR 5501 [c]). Rosenblatt, J.P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Santoro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 24, 1995
217 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Alexander v. Santoro

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA C. ALEXANDER et al., Respondents, v. ANDREW J. SANTORO, JR., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 24, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 642 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 242

Citing Cases

Alexander v. Santoro

A judgment was entered in this action on September 23, 1993 (see, Alexander v. Santoro, 217 A.D.2d 642…