From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Perrenoud

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Dec 1, 2004
03-C-0578-C (W.D. Wis. Dec. 1, 2004)

Opinion

03-C-0578-C.

December 1, 2004


ORDER


Judgment was entered in this case on October 15, 2004, granting defendant's motion for summary judgment and closing this case. On November 1, 2004, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal. Because the notice was not accompanied by the $255 fee for filing his appeal, I construed plaintiff's notice to include a request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. In an order dated November 3, 2004, I noted that plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is governed by the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act, which means that petitioner must pay an initial partial payment of the filing fee that has been calculated from a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his notice of appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Because petitioner had not submitted such a statement, I advised him that he could have until November 19, 2004, in which to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement for the six-month period beginning approximately June 15, 2004 to approximately November 15, 2004. I told plaintiff that if, by November 19, 2004, he failed to submit the required trust account statement or show cause for his failure to do so, then I would deny his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the ground that he has failed to show that he is entitled to indigent status on appeal. Plaintiff has not submitted the required statement.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED for plaintiff's failure to show that he is indigent.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Perrenoud

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Dec 1, 2004
03-C-0578-C (W.D. Wis. Dec. 1, 2004)
Case details for

Alexander v. Perrenoud

Case Details

Full title:DARRICK A. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. JAMES PERRENOUD, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Dec 1, 2004

Citations

03-C-0578-C (W.D. Wis. Dec. 1, 2004)

Citing Cases

Vaughn v. Litscher

However, in the interest of affording Plaintiff one final opportunity to proceed despite these failings, the…

Davila v. Teeling

Without the statement, the Court will be forced to deny his requests to proceed in forma pauperis, since his…