From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 13, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00155-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 13, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00155-BAJ-SCR

11-13-2013

RUSSELL ALEXANDER (#466172) v. STATE OF LOUISIANA PAROLE BOARD ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

On October 22, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff Russell Alexander's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the court's filing fee. (Doc. 9.) On August 5, 2013, Plaintiff was ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee by August 29, 2013. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff did not pay the fee. The Magistrate Judge subsequently issued a show cause order on September 27, 2013 to ascertain why the Court should not dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for failure to pay the fee. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff filed a timely response to the show cause order on October 4, 2013. (Doc. 8.) However, his response did not address the issue of the filing fee, nor did it comply with the Magistrate Judge's order to produce his inmate account statements.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation specifically notified Plaintiff that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), he had fourteen (14) days from the date he received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 9, at 1.) A review of the record indicates that Plaintiff did not file a memorandum in opposition to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Having carefully considered the Magistrate Judge's Report, the record, and the applicable law, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report is correct, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned matter be DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to pay the Court's filing fee.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 13th day of November, 2013.

____________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Alexander v. Louisiana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 13, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00155-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Alexander v. Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:RUSSELL ALEXANDER (#466172) v. STATE OF LOUISIANA PAROLE BOARD ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 13, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00155-BAJ-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 13, 2013)