From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Sep 13, 1938
169 Misc. 521 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)

Opinion

September 13, 1938.

Harry Schechter, for the plaintiff Rose Alexander.

Robert E. Mebel, for the defendant Marjorie A. Kelly.


The Court of Appeals in Holmes v. Gravenhorst ( 263 N.Y. 148), relied upon herein by the defendant, has stated that, in the absence of a contrary agreement entered into between the parties, there is no authority for holding that a mortgagor in possession may be evicted from the mortgaged premises prior to a sale under a judgment of foreclosure and sale. In the instant case, however, it was expressly stipulated under the provisions of the extension agreement that the owner would pay a reasonable rental for the premises in the event of default. The latter covenant clearly contemplates the exception to the general rule enunciated in the Holmes case. Plaintiffs' motion for a receiver of the rents granted. The order will be settled on notice. Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment has been withdrawn.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Kelly

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County
Sep 13, 1938
169 Misc. 521 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)
Case details for

Alexander v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:ROSE ALEXANDER and Others, Plaintiffs, v. MARJORIE A. KELLY and Others…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County

Date published: Sep 13, 1938

Citations

169 Misc. 521 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938)
7 N.Y.S.2d 617

Citing Cases

Carlin Trading Corp. v. Bennett

There is a marked distinction between the right to collect rent and the right to obtain possession, and the…