From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Holland

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 10, 2024
2:13-cv-09302-DDP (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2024)

Opinion

2:13-cv-09302-DDP (GJS)

12-10-2024

ANAND JON ALEXANDER, Petitioner v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEAN D. PREGERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative habeas petition, all relevant documents filed and lodged in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 114, “Report”], and Petitioner's Objections to the Report [Dkt. 123]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: the habeas petition is DENIED; and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Holland

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 10, 2024
2:13-cv-09302-DDP (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Alexander v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:ANAND JON ALEXANDER, Petitioner v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 10, 2024

Citations

2:13-cv-09302-DDP (GJS) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2024)