From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Eaton

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 31, 2024
CIVIL 5:22-cv-05066-JMG (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

CIVIL 5:22-cv-05066-JMG

01-31-2024

RAYMOND H. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. KELLY EATON PROBATION OFFICER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN M. GALLAGHER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 31st day of January 2024, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43), Plaintiff's Reply in Opposition thereto (ECF No. 48), and Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Reply (ECF No. 51).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART as follows for reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum:

1. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) is DENIED with respect to the December 2021, § 1983 false arrest claim against Probation Officer Eaton.

2. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED with respect to all other claims.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Eaton

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 31, 2024
CIVIL 5:22-cv-05066-JMG (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Alexander v. Eaton

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND H. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. KELLY EATON PROBATION OFFICER, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

CIVIL 5:22-cv-05066-JMG (E.D. Pa. Jan. 31, 2024)