From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Dresser LLC

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Oct 1, 2021
1:21-CV-00161 (W.D. La. Oct. 1, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:21-CV-00161

10-01-2021

FRED ALEXANDER, ET AL, Plaintiffs v. DRESSER, LLC, ET AL, Defendants


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

DAVID C. JOSEPH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [ECF No. 59], and after a de novo review of the record, including the Objection filed by Plaintiffs [ECF No. 60] and the Response filed by Defendants [ECF No. 61], having determined that the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand [ECF No. 16] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims against the LDEQ and Derek Descant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS, DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers on this 1st October 2021.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Dresser LLC

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Oct 1, 2021
1:21-CV-00161 (W.D. La. Oct. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Alexander v. Dresser LLC

Case Details

Full title:FRED ALEXANDER, ET AL, Plaintiffs v. DRESSER, LLC, ET AL, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

1:21-CV-00161 (W.D. La. Oct. 1, 2021)