From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 14, 2009
61 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

April 14, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered July 16, 2007, which, in an action against defendant City of New York for personal injuries sustained when a tree on the side of a road located in the Town of Carmel, Putnam County, uprooted and fell on the van in which plaintiff was a passenger, granted plaintiffs motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley and DeGrasse, JJ.


Plaintiffs original error in serving notices of claim on the Town of Carmel and Putnam County is excusable, based as it was on a reasonable belief that one or the other owned this roadway within the territorial jurisdiction of both, and plaintiffs subsequent delay in serving the true owner, the City of New York, is also excusable where he promptly moved to serve a late notice of claim against the City once advised by Putnam County that the site is owned by the City ( see Matter of Harris v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 168 AD2d 560). The transient nature of the condition refutes the City's claim of prejudice ( see id.).


Summaries of

Alexander v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 14, 2009
61 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Alexander v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER KOBERNIK, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 14, 2009

Citations

61 A.D.3d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
877 N.Y.S.2d 46

Citing Cases

Biddle v. The City of New York

Here, petitioner has provided a reasonable excuse for her delay based upon her reasonable misapprehension…