From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Casco Music Systems

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Mar 3, 1975
323 N.E.2d 912 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)

Opinion

March 3, 1975.

Mark J. Gladstone for the plaintiffs.

James S. Ellis for the defendant.


This action, which was commenced by writ dated May 31, 1967, was rightly dismissed on May 24, 1974, pursuant to G.L.c. 155, § 51, and G.L.c. 156B, § 102. Under those statutes the defendant's corporate existence continued for a period of three years following its dissolution on May 12, 1971, for the limited purpose of prosecuting and defending litigation. It is clear that upon the expiration of the three-year period, subject to the exception set forth in the proviso at the end of each of those statutes (inapplicable to actions, such as this one, commenced prior to dissolution), the defendant ceased to exist even for that limited purpose. Boston Tow Boat Co. v. Medford Natl. Bank, 228 Mass. 484, 486 (1917). Bowen v. Dorchester Ice Co. 255 Mass. 159 (1926).

Order dismissing action affirmed.


Summaries of

Alexander v. Casco Music Systems

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Mar 3, 1975
323 N.E.2d 912 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)
Case details for

Alexander v. Casco Music Systems

Case Details

Full title:ANITA P. ALEXANDER another vs. CASCO MUSIC SYSTEMS, INC

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: Mar 3, 1975

Citations

323 N.E.2d 912 (Mass. App. Ct. 1975)
3 Mass. App. Ct. 716

Citing Cases

MBC, Inc. v. Engel

Strict construction of the corporation continuance statute is required because matters concerning corporation…

Gallo v. Corsano

Upon the expiration of this three-year period, Wedgewood ceased to exist even for that limited purpose, and…