From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander v. Birnel

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 21, 2013
No. 10-13-00336-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 21, 2013)

Summary

rejecting similar argument as to federal rule of civil procedure and noting general rule in Texas that judgments must dispose of all parties and claims to be appealable

Summary of this case from Miller v. Garcia

Opinion

No. 10-13-00336-CV

11-21-2013

WILLIAM PATRICK ALEXANDER, Appellant v. LISA M. BIRNEL, RONALD FOX, EDWARD SMITH, WILLIS W. OWENS, III, JOHN E. RITTER, GILBERT CAMPUZANO, AND BRUCE ARMSTRONG, Appellees


From the 52nd District Court

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. COT-11-40924


MEMORANDUM OPINION

William P. Alexander, a prison inmate, attempts to appeal from the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of six of eight defendants sued by Alexander. By letter dated October 31, 2013, the Clerk of this Court notified Alexander that the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that the order which is the subject of the appeal is not a final, appealable order because it does not dispose of all parties and claims. By the same letter, the Clerk also warned Alexander that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, within 10 days from the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. A response was filed on November 12, 2013 but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

Alexander argues in his response that Rule 58(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows him to appeal an order that does not dispose of all parties and claims. The federal rules do not apply to Texas state courts of appeal. As a general rule in Texas, an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). An order or judgment is final when it disposes of all parties and claims. Id. at 205. The order Alexander attempts to appeal does not dispose of his claims against two defendants, Lisa M. Birnel and Ronald C. Fox.

Accordingly, the trial court's order, signed on September 11, 2013, is not final, and Alexander may not appeal that order at this time.

This appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by the Texas Supreme Court, a petition for review must be filed with the Texas Supreme Court clerk within 45 days after either the date the court of appeals' judgment was rendered or the date the last ruling on all timely motions for rehearing was made by the court of appeals. TEX. R. APP. P. 53.7(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
[CV06]


Summaries of

Alexander v. Birnel

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 21, 2013
No. 10-13-00336-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 21, 2013)

rejecting similar argument as to federal rule of civil procedure and noting general rule in Texas that judgments must dispose of all parties and claims to be appealable

Summary of this case from Miller v. Garcia
Case details for

Alexander v. Birnel

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM PATRICK ALEXANDER, Appellant v. LISA M. BIRNEL, RONALD FOX, EDWARD…

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

No. 10-13-00336-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 21, 2013)

Citing Cases

Miller v. Garcia

Miller's response cited to federal and Florida rules of procedure that do not apply to Texas appellate…