From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alexander Strull Advert. v. Acrolite Products

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1967
27 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

March 13, 1967


Motion by respondent for reargument granted and, upon reargument, the decision and order of this court, both dated December 27, 1966 [ 27 A.D.2d 574], are amended by providing that costs and disbursements shall abide the event, instead of awarding $10 costs and disbursements to appellant; determination in said decision and order otherwise adhered to. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Alexander Strull Advert. v. Acrolite Products

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 13, 1967
27 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Alexander Strull Advert. v. Acrolite Products

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER STRULL ADVERTISING, INC., Respondent, v. ACROLITE PRODUCTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)