Alemozaffar v. City County of San Francisco

Full title: MEHRDAD ALEMOZAFFAR, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 2009

Case No. C07-4494 JSW (N.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. C07-4494 JSW.

February 11, 2009

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669, City Attorney, JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961, Chief Trial Deputy, SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266, DANIEL A. ZAHEER, State Bar #237118, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO.

[ PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST FOR ORDER ALLOWING DEFENDANTS TO EXCEED 15 PAGE LIMIT IN THEIR REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [CIVIL L.R. 7-11]

JEFFREY WHITE, District Judge

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11(a), Defendants' submitted a Request For Order Allowing Defendants To Exceed Page Limit In Defendants' Reply to Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Having considered Defendants' submissions, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants' motion and allows Defendants to file a reply brief up to 18 pages, exclusive of tables, declarations and exhibits.