From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Aleman v. Zavala

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Oct 6, 2010
No. 04-10-00282-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. 04-10-00282-CV

Delivered and Filed: October 6, 2010.

Appealed from the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2007-CI-16346, Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding.

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution.

Sitting: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, REBECCA SIMMONS, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The reporter's record was originally due on May 7, 2010. On May 21, 2010, this court notified the court reporter that the reporter's record was late. The court reporter responded to our notice by filing a Notification of Late Record stating the reporter's record was not filed because appellants have not requested a reporter's record. If appellants desire a reporter's record to be filed in this appeal, they must request that a reporter's record be prepared. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1). Accordingly, on June 8, 2010, this court issued an order ordering appellants to (1) request in writing that a reporter's record be prepared and (2) designate in writing the exhibits and those portions of the record to be included in the reporter's record, if they desired a reporter's record. Id. The appellants were also ordered to file a copy of the request with both the trial court clerk, id. at 34.6(b)(2), and this court. Our order informed appellants that if they failed to respond within the time provided, their brief would be due within thirty (30) days from the date of the June 8, 2010 order, and the court would only consider those issues or points raised in appellants' brief that do not require a reporter's record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). Because appellants did not request a reporter's record, their brief, without reference to the reporter's record was due on July 8, 2010. No response was filed.

Accordingly, on July 20, 2010, appellants were ordered to file their brief no later than August 9, 2010. Our order informed appellants that if they failed to file the brief within the time provided the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Appellants did not respond. Accordingly, on August 30, 2010, appellants were ordered to show cause in writing, no later than September 10, 2010, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. No response has been filed.

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellants.


Summaries of

Aleman v. Zavala

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Oct 6, 2010
No. 04-10-00282-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Aleman v. Zavala

Case Details

Full title:Emilio ALEMAN and Isabel C. Aleman, Appellants v. Manuela ZAVALA, Consuelo…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Oct 6, 2010

Citations

No. 04-10-00282-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 6, 2010)