From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Alejandro v. Earl Glass

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2024
5:23-cv-02623-ODW-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-02623-ODW-SHK

01-18-2024

Armando Alejandro, Plaintiff, v. Earl Glass; CRST Expedited, Inc. a corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER REMANDING CASE TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Otis D. Wright II U.S. District Judge

Having considered the stipulation between Plaintiff, ARMANDO ALEJANDRO and Defendant, EARL GLASS, and good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, based on the “Forum Defendant Rule,” this matter is remanded to the Riverside County Superior Court, Riverside Historic Courthouse.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall pay Court fees, if any, associated with the remand, including copying costs of the Court's file to be forwarded to the Riverside County Superior Court, Riverside Historic Courthouse.


Summaries of

Alejandro v. Earl Glass

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 18, 2024
5:23-cv-02623-ODW-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Alejandro v. Earl Glass

Case Details

Full title:Armando Alejandro, Plaintiff, v. Earl Glass; CRST Expedited, Inc. a…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 18, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-02623-ODW-SHK (C.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2024)